
Pellentesque mollis nec orci id tincidunt. Sed mollis risus eu nisi aliquet, sit amet fermentum justo dapibus.
- (+55) 254. 254. 254
- Info@la-studioweb.com
- Helios Tower 75 Tam Trinh Hoang Mai - Ha Noi - Viet Nam
© 2019 Airi All rights reserved
No reply. No bite. No coverage.
If you’ve worked in PR long enough, you’ve been ghosted by a journalist. But in 2025, getting ignored on a first pitch isn’t a death sentence—it’s an invitation to refine, reframe, and re-pitch.
Done well, a re-pitch isn’t a nag. It’s a value-add. It shows respect for an editor’s time, awareness of the editorial cycle, and the strategic chops to rethink a narrative on the fly.
Most pitches don’t get a “no”—they get silence. But silence doesn’t always mean disinterest. Editors are:
That’s where a smart re-pitch comes in. If your story still has relevance—and especially if the timing or angle has shifted—it’s worth another shot. Just don’t copy/paste the original.
Start fresh. You can reference the original pitch—but lead with new context, not a guilt trip.
Structure:
Timing matters. Wait at least 5–7 business days after the original pitch. If the story isn’t urgent, 10–14 days is fair. Be brief. Be specific. Never send more than 2–3 follow-ups total unless you’re given a direct invitation to keep in touch.
The core mistake most people make in a re-pitch? Making it personal. “I really think this is a great story.” “We’d love your support.”
Instead, focus on value: Why would the audience care now? What’s fresh, urgent, or helpful?
Re-pitching isn’t desperate—it’s strategic. Editors expect it. They respect PR pros who know how to try again, not just louder—but smarter. When you treat every no as a not-yet, you keep the door open for the story to land when it’s meant to.
Because in media—as in life—timing is everything. And the second pitch is often the one that sticks.